In one 2008 edition of the journal 'The Reference Librarian,' David Murray writes as a guest columnist for a series of columns entitled "Pencils Never Crash: The Thoughtful Integration of Technology for Reference Service." One column, "iReference: Using Apple's iPhone as a Reference Tool" will be the focus of this post.
This interesting article examines the possibility of using an iPhone as a reference tool for librarians. Murray offers praise for the iPhone as well as offering suggestions for improvement. Murray compares the iPhone to a mini hand-held computer that a librarian can have with them at all times. Interestingly enough, he notes that his high esteem of the iPhone stems from the fact that the device delivers the
real World Wide Web, and doesn't rely upon hard to read mobile websites. He also emphasizes the speed with which the iPhone connects to the Internet, and notes that this makes a huge difference for librarians. Although the iPhone was introduced in 2007 with a 2.5G network, in 2008 the network was upgraded to 3G, and no longer relied upon wireless internet service to function. For librarians on the go, Internet connection speed is essential, and the iPhone delivers.
However, Murray offers ways in which the iPhone could be improved to better serve librarians. For example, the iPhone offers ease of search and the handy touch screen, but no cut and paste option. Cut and paste must be one of the most widely used functions of librarians today, affording the librarian the possibility to send links directly to patrons without having to spend several minutes clicking back and forth copying the url. Unfortunately, this is one downfall of the iPhone as a reference tool. Without this, unless there is a direct link on a site to email, it makes it extremely difficult to connect with patrons once material is found. Even when a librarian finds a book on a library's catalog, without cut and paste, they would have to revert back to the old pen and paper to even copy down the call number. If the iPhone were to succeed as a reference tool, this function is necessary.
The draw of the iPhone as a reference tool is the fact that it is portable, and could easily accompany an embedded librarian. The significance of an embedded librarian is that the librarian is embedded into places other than the reference or circulation desk. An embedded librarian circulates the library, making themselves known. She also appears in local coffee shops or restaurants, always ready to perform duties as a librarian. With the iPhone on hand, the embedded librarian would certainly thrive. Without being weighted down by a laptop, or having to boot it up each time a question arises (Murray praises the fact that iPhones have minimal booting up time and rarely crash), the librarian is able to offer quick, reliable information.
In conclusion, the iPhone has much potential as a reference tool for librarians. One issue I thought about while reading the article, that I was surprised that Murray didn't mention, was the cost. Although iPhones are all the rage right now, they are indeed expensive. The embedded librarian theme seems to be most popular at the moment in the realm of academic libraries, which perhaps have more money than do public libraries, but all the same, these tools would be difficult for libraries to work into their budgets. Therefore, if I were to predict the future of the iPhone as a reference tool for librarians, I would say that it would likely depend upon individual libraries. The libraries would certainly have to weigh the pros and cons of such an investment.
Full citation: Murray, D.C. (2008). "iReference: Using Apple's iPhone as a reference tool." The Reference Librarian, 49(2), pp. 167-169.